Go Back   Boxer Board > SHOW BOXER FORUMS > Showing - questions and answers

Showing - questions and answers For exchanging tips and general information on showing boxers in the conformation ring.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

 
  #1  
Old 03-19-2009, 03:12 PM
tAnKrOxX's Avatar
Boxer Pal
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA/California,Fresno
Posts: 20
Question When to crop the ears

So my boyfriend and I's puppy is about 3 months old. I'm hearing different stories of when we should crop the ears. I wanted to wait until his head was the "grown-up" size so then if his ears were cropped too short, it wouldn't look like he had no ears. But I heard that's not good, that they should be cropped sooner. What do you guys suggest? Should we wait, or should we do it soon? And when is too soon? I just don't want him too look like we screwed up on his ears and he has to walk around with really bad ears. He is our baby after all
__________________
Anarchy- flashy fawn docked floppy 12/28/08
Chaos- green iguana
Sponsored Links

 
  #2  
Old 03-19-2009, 03:30 PM
gmacleod's Avatar
Elusive Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 14,694
Cropping, if done at all, is rarely successful after 12 weeks of age. There aren't too many vets willing to attempt it beyond that age either
__________________
Not sure, or just haven't read them? Read the Rules before you post please.

 
  #3  
Old 03-20-2009, 07:26 AM
Jan's Avatar
Jan Jan is offline
Reasonable Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Lakeland, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 8,948
You are probably too late already, as the best time to crop is around 8 weeks of age.

You puppy is very cute and has lovely ears, I would leave just well enough alone. I did crop my previous boxer and I can tell you it is a lot of work and there is no guarantee that the ears will stand correctly. I taped Markus' ears for a year and one of them never stood correctly.

Good luck!
__________________
Jan
Markus, male brindle Jan 26/94 to Apr 29/05
Tara, IWS May17/02 -
Terramoto, Male white boxer. Nov 2/06-
The Following User Says Thank You to Jan For This Useful Post:
LILYLARUE (03-20-2009)

 
  #4  
Old 03-21-2009, 09:24 PM
Kilby'sMum's Avatar
Boxer Booster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Australia, Melbourne
Posts: 220
I don't think much cropping is done here in Aus... we love their floppy ears. I would agree that your baby is probably too old for it now though.

 
  #5  
Old 03-22-2009, 04:01 AM
gmacleod's Avatar
Elusive Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 14,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilby'sMum View Post
I don't think much cropping is done here in Aus... we love their floppy ears.
And cropping ears has been illegal in Australia since the 1800's so not an option anyway.

 
  #6  
Old 03-24-2009, 06:24 AM
Kilby'sMum's Avatar
Boxer Booster
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Australia, Melbourne
Posts: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmacleod View Post
And cropping ears has been illegal in Australia since the 1800's so not an option anyway.
Yep and docking tails is illegal too but you still see plenty of docked puppies!

 
  #7  
Old 03-24-2009, 02:38 PM
TwoDogs's Avatar
Super Boxer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA, Massachusetts
Posts: 339
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kilby'sMum View Post
Yep and docking tails is illegal too but you still see plenty of docked puppies!
Is it illegal to show a dog with a docked tail but legal to dock the tails of dogs that are intended to be sold to working homes in Australia? That's how it is in parts of Europe.

Personally, I think it is more inhumane to not dock the tail and remove the dewclaws in a working dog and therefore increase the risk of injury in the field than to leave them undocked. I also think that preventing docked/cropped dogs from showing will only further the division between "show" lines and "working" lines in many breeds.

The cropping of the ears, I understand. That procedure takes time to heal, is more invasive, and if care isn't taken with the taping, there is more chance of it going wrong and even resulting in infection. But I have no problem with dewclaw removal or with docking of the tail though, provided it's done on the 3rd day of life. EEG studies in the 60's of newborn pups as well as other studies before and since, show that their nervous systems are not fully developed at 3 days and as a result, they experience virtually no pain associated with the procedures.

 
  #8  
Old 03-24-2009, 02:53 PM
gmacleod's Avatar
Elusive Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 14,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoDogs View Post
Personally, I think it is more inhumane to not dock the tail and remove the dewclaws in a working dog and therefore increase the risk of injury in the field than to leave them undocked. I also think that preventing docked/cropped dogs from showing will only further the division between "show" lines and "working" lines in many breeds.
Well, that rather depends on the type of work the dog is going to do, and whether the country in question has the type of conditions that gave rise to docking/cropping in the first place. Australia broadly does not have those conditions. And zero percent of boxers do that sort of work anyway

 
  #9  
Old 03-26-2009, 03:17 PM
TwoDogs's Avatar
Super Boxer
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: USA, Massachusetts
Posts: 339
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmacleod View Post
Well, that rather depends on the type of work the dog is going to do, and whether the country in question has the type of conditions that gave rise to docking/cropping in the first place. Australia broadly does not have those conditions. And zero percent of boxers do that sort of work anyway
You're absolutely right. I was primarily refering to some of the breeds of hunting dogs who are out in rough brush all day. Tail injuries are not uncommon in spaniels left undocked as well as German pointers--and a ripped dewclaw is a nasty thing.

I just think to make a blanket statement that docking, cropping, and dewclaw removal are inhumane really doesn't do anyone--even the dogs sometimes--any good at all. Yes, docking for purely cosmetic reasons, or docking past the recommended age are ethically questionable. But to say that someone is inhumane for docking their working spaniel is rediculous to me.

 
  #10  
Old 03-26-2009, 03:20 PM
gmacleod's Avatar
Elusive Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 14,694
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoDogs View Post
But to say that someone is inhumane for docking their working spaniel is rediculous to me.
Nobody said it...